Js. Johnston, Should the law ignore commercial norms? A comment on the Bernstein conjecture and its relevance for contract law theory and reform, MICH LAW R, 99(7), 2001, pp. 1791-1810
Professor Bernstein's study(1) of the interaction between private law and n
orms in the cotton industry is the latest installment in her ongoing invest
igation into the relationship between law and norms in trades ranging from
the diamond market to grain and feed markets. Her incredibly detailed and t
horough exploration of private lawmaking and commercial norms - and their i
nteraction - stands as one of the most significant contributions to contrac
t and commercial law scholarship made in the last half-century. The cotton
industry study upon which I focus in this Comment not only reports fascinat
ing findings about dispute resolution practices, but also presents a number
of intriguing and complementary theoretical insights into those practices.
Bernstein's empirical findings call into question some of the fundamental
results in the economic analysis of contract law, such as the theory that e
xpectation damages induce efficient breach of contract. Her central inducti
on from her discoveries about cotton industry practices is that the best wa
y for the law to encourage the development of extralegal norms of commercia
l reasonableness and the enforcement of those norms via commercial reputati
on may be, paradoxically, to make those norms irrelevant in formal dispute
resolution. This hypothesis - which I dub the "Bernstein Conjecture" - sugg
ests that the underlying methodological supposition in Article 2 of the Uni
form Commercial Code - that the law should mirror or reflect actual commerc
ial norms - may in fact be destructive of the very norms it seeks to incorp
orate. This is no small implication. For this reason, after beginning with
a few methodological quibbles, the bulk of this Comment focuses on the Bern
stein Conjecture. I first develop an informal but quite general analysis of
the role of the law in deterring commercial opportunism, and I then focus
more precisely on identifying the social and market context in which the Be
rnstein Conjecture is likely to hold.