E. Paraskevaidis et al., Human papillomavirus testing and the outcome of treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, OBSTET GYN, 98(5), 2001, pp. 833-836
Objective: To investigate whether human papillomavirus (BPV) testing could
be used in the follow-up after large loop excision of the transformation zo
ne (LLETZ) for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 41 women who developed subse
quent CIN after LLETZ (group A) and 82 women without CIN for a minimum of 5
years after LLETZ (group B). The first post-treatment cervical smear was r
etrieved and examined for high-risk BPV deoxyribonucleic acid. The sensitiv
ity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio of HPV testing, fi
rst post-treatment Papanicolaou. test, and excision margins for the detecti
on of treatment failure were calculated. Multiple logistic regression analy
sis was also done.
Results: The BPV test was positive in 38 of 41 women in group A and 13 of 8
2 in group B (P<.001). An abnormal cytologic result in the first post-treat
ment smear was found in 20 of 41 in group A and 11 of 82 in group B (P<.001
). Sixteen women in group A and 18 in group B had involved margins (P=.046)
. Values for the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likeli
hood ratios of the HPV test were 93% 84%, 5.8, 0.08; for die Papanicolaou t
est they were 49%, 87%, 3.9, 0.586; and for margin status they were 39%, 78
%, 1.8, 0.782, respectively. Positive HPV test presents significantly high
odds ratio for treatment failure (P<.001), independent of cytology and marg
in status.
Conclusion: Women who postoperatively have positive HPV testing are at high
er risk of treatment failure. This could be performed at die first post-tre
atment visit and further follow-up could be adjusted accordingly. (Obstet G
ynecol 2001;98:833-6. (C) 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists.).