Surface roughness assessment of resin-based materials during brushing preceded by pH-cycling simulations

Citation
Cp. Turssi et al., Surface roughness assessment of resin-based materials during brushing preceded by pH-cycling simulations, OPER DENT, 26(6), 2001, pp. 576-584
Citations number
48
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY
ISSN journal
03617734 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
576 - 584
Database
ISI
SICI code
0361-7734(200111/12)26:6<576:SRAORM>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
This study evaluated the surface roughness pattern of resin-based restorati ve materials during brushing preceded by a regimen that simulated a dynamic pH-cycling. Restoratives included two resin composites (Renamel Microfill and Charisma), two polyacid-modified composite resins (Compoglass-F and Dyr act AP) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC Improved). Twenty standardized cylindrical specimens of each material were prepared ac cording to a randomized complete block design. After finishing and polishin g, the average surface roughness (Ra) and profile-length ratio (LR) of the specimens were determined. The experimental units were subjected to a PH-cy cling regimen, and then to 10,000 brushing strokes. New readings of both th e Ra. and LR parameters were obtained. The same protocol of pH-cycling, bru shing simulation and surface roughness measurements were repeated 10 times. Data was analyzed using ANOVA according to split-plot design and Tukey's t est. Results showed the PH-cycling followed by 10,000 brushing strokes prov ided a remarkable increase in Ra for all restorative materials except for R enamel. Throughout the brushing simulation, Renamel, Charisma, Compoglass-F and Dyract AP showed steady textures, whereas Fuji II LC Improved exhibite d a progressive increase in surface roughness. Among the materials tested, Renamel presented the smoothest surface, followed by Charisma and Compoglas s-F, which did not differ from each other except at the baseline. Dyract AP was different from both these materials except at the baseline. Fuji II LC Improved had the roughest surface texture.