Be. Cook et Gb. Bartley, Treatment options and future prospects for the management of eyelid malignancies - An evidence-based update, OPHTHALMOL, 108(11), 2001, pp. 2088-2098
Purpose: To provide evidence-based clinical recommendations for treatment o
ptions and future, prospects for the management of common malignant eyelid
tumors, including global ratings for the strength of published, evidence su
pporting them,
Clinical Relevance. Approximately 5% to 10% of all skin cancers occur in th
e eyelid. Incidence studies indicate that basal cell carcinoma is the most
frequent malignant eyelid tumor, followed by squamous cell carcinoma, sebac
eous gland carcinoma, and malignant melanoma. Many therapeutic methods have
been suggested to combat the morbidity and mortality associated with these
lesions.
Literature Reviewed: A MEDLINE and PubMed literature search (1966-1999) was
conducted for English language abstracts and appropriate (selected) full-t
ext references retrieved regarding treatment of malignant eyelid tumors. Th
ese sources then were used to prepare recommendations for patient care. Eac
h recommendation was rated according to: (1) its importance in the care pro
cess and (2) the strength of evidence supporting the given recommendation.
Results: All recommendations were rated as level A (very important to patie
nt-care outcome). For basal cell; carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and s
ebaceous gland carcinoma, the published evidence supporting two recommendat
ions (Mohs' micrographic surgery or excision with frozen-section control) w
ere graded as I (providing strong evidence in support of a recommendation).
For sebaceous gland carcinoma, the recommendations also included conjuncti
val map biopsies. The published evidence supporting all other recommendatio
ns for these three eyelid tumors were graded II (substantial evidence in su
pport of a recommendation), primarily because of the small numbers of patie
nts in each clinical study. For malignant melanoma, the recommendation for
therapy (i.e., excision with variable margins depending on tumor thickness)
was based on published papers individually variably rated as I, II, and II
I, reflecting ongoing debate as to the best method of therapy.
Conclusions: Published reports regarding the treatment of malignant eyelid
tumors include a myriad of treatment options. The strongest evidence favors
complete surgical removal using histologic controls for verifying tumor-fr
ee margins of excision. Ophthalmology 2001;108.2088-2100 (C) 2001 by the Am
erican Academy of Ophthalmology.