WHY DO WE FAIL IN AGING THE SKULL FROM THE SAGITTAL SUTURE

Citation
I. Hershkovitz et al., WHY DO WE FAIL IN AGING THE SKULL FROM THE SAGITTAL SUTURE, American journal of physical anthropology, 103(3), 1997, pp. 393-399
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Anthropology,"Art & Humanities General",Mathematics,"Biology Miscellaneous
ISSN journal
00029483
Volume
103
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
393 - 399
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9483(1997)103:3<393:WDWFIA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The controversy over the reliability of ectocranial suture status (ope n vs. closed) as an age estimation stimulated the pursuit of Meindl an d Lovejoy's suggestion (Meindl and Lovejoy [1985]Am. J. Phys. Anthropo l. 68:57-66) for large scale analysis. The extent of the sagittal sutu re closure was assessed in 3,636 skulls from the Hamann-Todd and Terry collections. The debate over whether cranial suture ossification repr esents a pathologic or an age-predictable pathologic process also stim ulated a comparison with age and two stress markers, hyperostosis fron talis interna and tuberculosis. Sagittal suture closure was found to b e age-independent and sexually biased. The wide confidence intervals ( for age) appear to preclude meaningful application of suture status fo r age determination. No correlation was found the tested biologic stre ssors. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.