I. Hershkovitz et al., WHY DO WE FAIL IN AGING THE SKULL FROM THE SAGITTAL SUTURE, American journal of physical anthropology, 103(3), 1997, pp. 393-399
The controversy over the reliability of ectocranial suture status (ope
n vs. closed) as an age estimation stimulated the pursuit of Meindl an
d Lovejoy's suggestion (Meindl and Lovejoy [1985]Am. J. Phys. Anthropo
l. 68:57-66) for large scale analysis. The extent of the sagittal sutu
re closure was assessed in 3,636 skulls from the Hamann-Todd and Terry
collections. The debate over whether cranial suture ossification repr
esents a pathologic or an age-predictable pathologic process also stim
ulated a comparison with age and two stress markers, hyperostosis fron
talis interna and tuberculosis. Sagittal suture closure was found to b
e age-independent and sexually biased. The wide confidence intervals (
for age) appear to preclude meaningful application of suture status fo
r age determination. No correlation was found the tested biologic stre
ssors. (C) 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.