The Demand-Control model of occupational stress posits an interaction betwe
en job demands and job control predicting psychological strain, but previou
s research has found such an interaction only rarely or inconsistently. Suc
h research, however, has often failed to measure either demands or strain f
aithfully to the model's constructs, or has simply failed to test for a sta
tistical interaction. The present study corrected these shortcomings by goi
ng back to basics. Using a sample of 115 employees in a manufacturing compa
ny. it operationalized the variables more consistently with their original
conceptualizations. However, when the hypothesized Demand-Control interacti
on was then tested. it still failed. Outcomes other than psychogical strain
(e.g. job dissatisfaction) were related negatively rather than positively
to demands. This highlights the difference between psychological strain and
dissatisfaction and casts doubt on models positing dissatisfaction as an i
ntervening variable between stressors and strains.