Back to basics: Re-examination of Demand-Control Theory of occupational stress

Citation
Ta. Beehr et al., Back to basics: Re-examination of Demand-Control Theory of occupational stress, WORK STRESS, 15(2), 2001, pp. 115-130
Citations number
52
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
WORK AND STRESS
ISSN journal
02678373 → ACNP
Volume
15
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
115 - 130
Database
ISI
SICI code
0267-8373(200104/06)15:2<115:BTBROD>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
The Demand-Control model of occupational stress posits an interaction betwe en job demands and job control predicting psychological strain, but previou s research has found such an interaction only rarely or inconsistently. Suc h research, however, has often failed to measure either demands or strain f aithfully to the model's constructs, or has simply failed to test for a sta tistical interaction. The present study corrected these shortcomings by goi ng back to basics. Using a sample of 115 employees in a manufacturing compa ny. it operationalized the variables more consistently with their original conceptualizations. However, when the hypothesized Demand-Control interacti on was then tested. it still failed. Outcomes other than psychogical strain (e.g. job dissatisfaction) were related negatively rather than positively to demands. This highlights the difference between psychological strain and dissatisfaction and casts doubt on models positing dissatisfaction as an i ntervening variable between stressors and strains.