T. Kamohara et al., A comparison of myocardial function after primary cardiac and primary asphyxial cardiac arrest, AM J R CRIT, 164(7), 2001, pp. 1221-1224
Although myocardial dysfunction after resuscitation from ventricular fibril
lation (VF) has been extensively investigated, less is known of the functio
n of the myocardium after asphyxial cardiac arrest. The present experimenta
l study was designed to compare postresuscitation left ventricular (LV) fun
ction after cardiac arrest caused by asphyxia with that of cardiac arrest i
nduced by dysrhythmia. Four groups of Sprague-Dawley rats, which included e
ight animals in each group, were investigated. In the first two groups, car
diac arrest followed asphyxia produced by neuromuscular blockade with and w
ithout airway obstruction. In a third group, cardiac arrest was induced by
electrical fibrillation of the ventricle. The fourth group represented anim
als in which the duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest was maintained for a
time interval corresponding to that of the VF group. The fourth group recei
ved approximately the same number of electrical shocks as the third (VF) gr
oup. All animals were successfully resuscitated with precordial compression
and mechanical ventilation. Postresuscitation measurements, including card
iac output, LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP), rate of pressure rise at LV
pressure of 40 mm Hg (LV dP/dt(40)), and negative LV dP/dt, demonstrated de
creased myocardial function in each group. No differences in cardiac functi
on were observed between the animals with primary respiratory arrest whethe
r or not the airway was obstructed. However, disproportionate and consisten
tly greater impairment in myocardial function followed primary cardiac arre
st due to VF when compared with equal duration of asphyxial cardiac arrest.
We conclude that in this healthy animal model, asphyxial cardiac arrest re
sulted in significantly lesser impairment of postresuscitation myocardial f
unction when compared with cardiac arrest caused by VF.