Staff members supporting people with mental retardation in residential care
were given scenarios describing tasks they might carry out and asked what
would happen if they did, or failed to do, them (i.e., who would notice, wh
at would their reaction be). Only a minority reported strong, certain conse
quences for anything they did from residents, families, or external profess
ionals. Although a majority reported consequences from managers or coworker
s, a large minority did not. The tasks for which most staff members reporte
d consequences were administration, followed by enabling residents. Results
suggest that staff members who give priority to administration may be resp
onding to the contingencies established by their managers and that a shift
in priorities may be required to improve staff members' interactions with c
lients.