An out-patient second-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A phase II study of the Hellenic Co-Operative Oncology Group
D. Pectasides et al., An out-patient second-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A phase II study of the Hellenic Co-Operative Oncology Group, ANTICANC R, 21(4B), 2001, pp. 3005-3010
Thirty-nine patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, refractory o
r resistant to platinum or taxanes derivatives were treated on an out-patie
nt basis with vinorelbine 25mg/m(2) intravenous (I.V.) on days 1 and 8 foll
owed by gemcitabine 800mg/m(2) L V. on days 1 and 8. Chemotherapy was repea
ted every 3 weeks. The patients were evaluated for response every two cycle
s of treatment. All 39 patients were assessable for toxicity and 35 were as
sessable for response, On an intent to treat analysis, only 1 (2.6%) patien
t achieved a partial response (PR) (95% CI 0.09% to 17.6%); fourteen patien
ts (35.9%, 95% CI 29.45% to 67.4%) had stable disease (SD) and 24 (61.5%) h
ad progressive disease (PD). The median time to tumor progression (TTP) was
4.7 months (range 0.13 to 18.9 months), the median survival time was 7.3 m
onths (range 0.6 to 18.9 months) and the 1-year survival rate was 35%. Clin
ical benefit response including improvement of PS, dyspnea and anorexia, pa
in and cough reduction and cessation of hemoptysis and fever was observed i
n 10% to 50% of patients. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred only in 2 (5.2%) p
atients. Five patients experienced febrile neutropenia, which was successfu
lly treated with G-CSF and broad-spectrum antibiotics. No patient experienc
ed grade 3/4 anaemia or thrombocytopenia. One patient experienced grade 4 f
atigue and stopped the treatment. Nausea / vomiting, fatigue, neurotoxicity
, diarrhea and fever were mild in the majority of patients and did not resu
lt in any clinically, significant problem. There were no treatment-related
deaths. In conclusion, the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine showe
d low objective response rate in patients previously treated with CDDP/taxa
nes-containing regimens. This regimen was relatively, well- tolerated and w
as associated with prolonged 1-year survival and improvement in cancer rela
ted symptoms. To validate these findings a randomized trial of gemcitabine
and vinorelbine versus taxotere or best supportive care is required.