We have revisited the calibration of the visual binary system zeta Herculis
with the goal to give the seismological properties of the G0 IV sub-giant
zeta Her A. The sum of masses and the mass fraction are derived from the mo
st recent astrometric data mostly based on the hipparcos ones. We have deri
ved the effective temperatures, the luminosities and the metallicities from
available spectroscopic data and tycho photometric data and calibrations.
For the calculations of evolutionary models we have used updated physics an
d the most recent physical data. A chi (2) minimization is performed to app
roach the most reliable modeling parameters which reproduce the observation
s within their error bars. For the age of the zeta Her binary system we hav
e obtained t(zeta) (Her) = 3387 Myr, for the masses m(zeta) (Her) (A) = 1.4
5 M. and m(zeta) (Her) (B) = 0.98 M., for the initial helium mass fraction
Y-i = 0.243, for the initial mass ratio of heavy elements to hydrogen (Z/X)
(i) = 0.0269 and for the mixing-length parameters Lambda (zeta) (Her) (A) =
0.92 and Lambda (zeta) (Her) (B) = 0.90 using the Canuto & Mazitelli (1991
, 1992) convection theory. Our results do not exclude that zeta Her A is it
self a binary sub-system as has been suspected many times in the past centu
ry; the mass of the hypothetical unseen companion would be m(zeta) (Her) (A
) less than or similar to 0.5 M., a value significantly smaller than previo
us determinations. A calibration made with an overshoot of the convective c
ore of zeta Her A leads to similar results but with a slight increase of ap
proximate to +250 Myr for the age. The adiabatic oscillation spectrum of ze
ta Her A is found to be a complicated superposition of acoustic and gravity
modes. Some of these waves have a dual character. This greatly complicates
the classification of the non-radial modes. For l = 1 the modes all have b
oth energy in the core and in the envelope; they are mixed modes. For l = 2
, 3 there is a succession of modes with energy either in the core or in the
envelope with a few mixed modes. The echelle diagram used by the observers
to extract the frequencies will work for l = 0; 2; 3. The large difference
is found to be of the order of <(<Delta>nu (0))over bar> approximate to 42
mu Hz, in agreement with the Martic et al. (2001) seismic observations.