Comparative analysis of human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4(+) T-cell frequency and lymphoproliferative response in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients

Citation
G. Piccinini et al., Comparative analysis of human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4(+) T-cell frequency and lymphoproliferative response in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients, CL DIAG LAB, 8(6), 2001, pp. 1225-1230
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY
ISSN journal
1071412X → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1225 - 1230
Database
ISI
SICI code
1071-412X(200111)8:6<1225:CAOHCC>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Evaluation of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T-helper immunity could contribute in optimizing anti-HCMV therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. Testin the lymphoproliferative response (LPR) is the standard technique used to evaluate T-helper response, but its use in t he routine diagnostic laboratory setting can be problematic. The most promi sing new alternative technique is the determination of HCMV-specific CD4(+) T-cell frequency by flow cytometry detection of intracellular cytokine pro duction after short-term antigen-specific activation of peripheral blood mo nonuclear cells. HCMV-specific LPR and CD4(+) T-cell frequency were compare d in a group of 78 blood samples from 65 HIV-infected patients. The results showed concordance in 80.7% of samples. In addition, comparative analysis of sequential blood samples from 13 HIV-infected patients showed that while in about half of patients the T-helper HCMV-specific immune response remai ned stable during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), in the othe r half declining levels of the HCMV-specific CD4(+)-mediated immune respons e were:determined by either one or both assays. In conclusion, our data sug gest that the determination of HCMV-specific CD4(+) T-cell frequency can be considered a valuable alternative to the LPR test for the detection of HCM V-specific T-helper response in HIV-infected patients. It could facilitate wider screening of anti-HCMV T-helper activity in HIV-infected patients, wi th potential benefits for clinicians in deciding strategies of discontinuat ion or maintenance of anti-HCMV therapy.