Comparative analysis of human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4(+) T-cell frequency and lymphoproliferative response in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients
G. Piccinini et al., Comparative analysis of human cytomegalovirus-specific CD4(+) T-cell frequency and lymphoproliferative response in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients, CL DIAG LAB, 8(6), 2001, pp. 1225-1230
Evaluation of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV)-specific T-helper immunity could
contribute in optimizing anti-HCMV therapy in human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)-infected patients. Testin the lymphoproliferative response (LPR) is
the standard technique used to evaluate T-helper response, but its use in t
he routine diagnostic laboratory setting can be problematic. The most promi
sing new alternative technique is the determination of HCMV-specific CD4(+)
T-cell frequency by flow cytometry detection of intracellular cytokine pro
duction after short-term antigen-specific activation of peripheral blood mo
nonuclear cells. HCMV-specific LPR and CD4(+) T-cell frequency were compare
d in a group of 78 blood samples from 65 HIV-infected patients. The results
showed concordance in 80.7% of samples. In addition, comparative analysis
of sequential blood samples from 13 HIV-infected patients showed that while
in about half of patients the T-helper HCMV-specific immune response remai
ned stable during highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), in the othe
r half declining levels of the HCMV-specific CD4(+)-mediated immune respons
e were:determined by either one or both assays. In conclusion, our data sug
gest that the determination of HCMV-specific CD4(+) T-cell frequency can be
considered a valuable alternative to the LPR test for the detection of HCM
V-specific T-helper response in HIV-infected patients. It could facilitate
wider screening of anti-HCMV T-helper activity in HIV-infected patients, wi
th potential benefits for clinicians in deciding strategies of discontinuat
ion or maintenance of anti-HCMV therapy.