Ademetionine 1,4-butanedisulphonate vs traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of acute viral hepatitis with hepatocellular jaundice

Authors
Citation
Be. Wang, Ademetionine 1,4-butanedisulphonate vs traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of acute viral hepatitis with hepatocellular jaundice, CLIN DRUG I, 21(10), 2001, pp. 685-694
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology,"Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION
ISSN journal
11732563 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
10
Year of publication
2001
Pages
685 - 694
Database
ISI
SICI code
1173-2563(2001)21:10<685:A1VTCM>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of ademetionine 1,4-butanedisulphonate ( Ade-SD4) versus a traditional Chinese remedy (TCR) in patients with hepatoc ellular jaundice associated with acute viral hepatitis. Patients: 253 patients were enrolled and 148 completed the study. Methods: In this randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group study, patients (aged 14 to 65 years) with elevated serum bilirubin levels (>2 x upper limit of normal) received either Ade-SD4 (ademetionine I g) intraveno usly once daily for 2 weeks then oral Ade-SD4 (ademetionine 0.5g) twice dai ly for 4 weeks, or TCR (Capillarin, a herbal derivative, 30ml intravenously once daily for 2 weeks, then oral Capillarin 30ml for 4 weeks plus six tab lets of Tanshinone, a Salvia miltiorrhiza derivative, once daily throughout the 6 weeks). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by changes in serum bilirub in (total and conjugated) and transaminases, fatigue and jaundice after 7, 14, 28 and 42 days. Results: Both Ade-SD4 (n = 132) and TCR (n = 121) significantly improved se rum transaminases, albumin, alkaline phosphatase,,gamma -glutamyl transfera se and total bile acids, improvements in serum total and conjugated bilirub in and alanine amino transferase (ALT) were significantly greater with Ade- SD4 than with TCR. After 7 days of treatment, median total bilirubin was 2. 23 mg/dl in Ade-SD4-treated patients vs 3.08 mg/dl in TCR-treated patients (p = 0.0001), while conjugated bilirubin and ALT were, respectively, 0.97 v s 1.5 mg/dl (p = 0.0001) and 116 vs 162 U/L (p = 0.0006). At day 7, the pro portion of serum total and conjugated bilirubin responders was significantl y higher in the Ade-SD4 group (69 and 73%, respectively) than in the TCR gr oup (50 and 54%, respectively; p less than or equal to 0.004). Significant differences in favour of Ade-SD4 were observed for jaundice (p = 0.01), fat igue (p = 0.004), general discomfort (p 0.05), urinary discoloration (p = 0 .02), nausea (p = 0.01), anorexia (p = 0.001), and patient (p = 0.01) and p hysician (p = 0.05) assessments of treatment efficacy. Both treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: Ade-SD4 is significantly more effective than TCR in reducing th e severity and duration of hepatocellular jaundice associated with acute vi ral hepatitis.