Although septoplasty and submucous resections are common procedures, there
have been very few studies on the outcome of nasal septal surgery. This pro
spective study of two hundred patients undergoing septal surgery used the F
airley nasal symptom score, the Nottingham health profile, a general health
questionnaire and clinical examination of nasal cavities to assess the out
come. A wide range of baseline severity scores was observed. Almost 40% of
patients failed to attend for review. Analysis of the outcomes in the remai
ning 121 patients revealed significant improvement in (a) nasal obstruction
in 74%, (b) facial pain in 72%, and (c) catarrh in 64% of patients. There
was a lack of correlation between observed postoperative reduction in the n
umber of nasal septal areas deviated and improvement in nasal obstruction.
The Nottingham health profile and general health questionnaire scores remai
ned unchanged in a large majority of patients. Postoperative improvement in
nasal obstruction was independent of grade of surgeon or concomitant later
al nasal wall surgery. The principal benefits of septal surgery relate to i
mprovement in nasal symptoms. The generic quality-of-life measures such as
the Nottingham health profile and general health questionnaire did not show
significant improvement in quality of life. Our results support the use of
disease-specific instruments to evaluate the outcome of septal surgery.