Nasal septal surgery: evaluation of symptomatic and general health outcomes

Citation
Ps. Arunachalam et al., Nasal septal surgery: evaluation of symptomatic and general health outcomes, CLIN OTOLAR, 26(5), 2001, pp. 367-370
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Otolaryngology
Journal title
CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY
ISSN journal
03077772 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
367 - 370
Database
ISI
SICI code
0307-7772(200110)26:5<367:NSSEOS>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Although septoplasty and submucous resections are common procedures, there have been very few studies on the outcome of nasal septal surgery. This pro spective study of two hundred patients undergoing septal surgery used the F airley nasal symptom score, the Nottingham health profile, a general health questionnaire and clinical examination of nasal cavities to assess the out come. A wide range of baseline severity scores was observed. Almost 40% of patients failed to attend for review. Analysis of the outcomes in the remai ning 121 patients revealed significant improvement in (a) nasal obstruction in 74%, (b) facial pain in 72%, and (c) catarrh in 64% of patients. There was a lack of correlation between observed postoperative reduction in the n umber of nasal septal areas deviated and improvement in nasal obstruction. The Nottingham health profile and general health questionnaire scores remai ned unchanged in a large majority of patients. Postoperative improvement in nasal obstruction was independent of grade of surgeon or concomitant later al nasal wall surgery. The principal benefits of septal surgery relate to i mprovement in nasal symptoms. The generic quality-of-life measures such as the Nottingham health profile and general health questionnaire did not show significant improvement in quality of life. Our results support the use of disease-specific instruments to evaluate the outcome of septal surgery.