Evaluation of diagnostic methods for Helicobacter bilis infection in laboratory mice

Citation
E. Hodzic et al., Evaluation of diagnostic methods for Helicobacter bilis infection in laboratory mice, COMPAR MED, 51(5), 2001, pp. 406-412
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences","Animal & Plant Sciences
Journal title
COMPARATIVE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
15320820 → ACNP
Volume
51
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
406 - 412
Database
ISI
SICI code
1532-0820(200110)51:5<406:EODMFH>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Disease-susceptible (C3H) and -resistant (B6) immunocompetent and immunodef icient (C3H-scid and B6-rag1) mice were examined up to 10 weeks after inocu lation with Helicobacter bilis (a prototype species of proven virulence). I nfection was monitored weekly by use of fecal culture, polymerase chain rea ction (PCR) nucleic acid amplification, membrane extract enzyme-linked immu nosorbent assay (ELISA), and histologic examination. All mice became infect ed by three to five weeks after inoculation, on the basis of results of cul ture and PCR analysis of feces. The PCR analysis was more sensitive than cu lture at determining infection status, particularly during early infection. None of the mice had evidence of disease by week 10. Immunoglobulin G sero conversion was detectable in C3H mice by week eight and in B6 mice by week nine. Results indicated that culture and PCR analysis are more sensitive th an is membrane extract ELISA serologic testing for detecting early infectio n in individual mice, regardless of genotype or immune status. Results unde rscore the need for improved seroassays for this important group of murine pathogens.