Cyclosporin - An updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (Neoral((R)))(1) in organ transplantation
Cj. Dunn et al., Cyclosporin - An updated review of the pharmacokinetic properties, clinical efficacy and tolerability of a microemulsion-based formulation (Neoral((R)))(1) in organ transplantation, DRUGS, 61(13), 2001, pp. 1957-2016
Cyclosporin is a lipophilic cyclic polypeptide immunosuppressant that inter
feres with the activity of T cells chiefly via calcineurin inhibition. The
original oil-based oral formulation of this drug (Sandimmun (R))(1) was cha
racterised by high intra- and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability, wit
h poor bioavailability in many patients; a novel microemulsion formulation
(Neoral (R))(1) was therefore developed to circumvent these problems, Studi
es show increases, attributable chiefly to improved absorption in patients
who absorb the drug only poorly from the original formulation, in mean syst
emic exposure to cyclosporin with the microemulsion, with no clinically sig
nificant differences in tolerability or drug interaction profiles.
Cyclosporin microemulsion is at least as effective as the oil-based formula
tion in renal, liver and heart transplant recipients, with trends towards d
ecreased incidence of acute rejection with the microemulsion formulation in
some (statistically significant in a few) trials. Cyclosporin microemulsio
n and tacrolimus appear to have similar efficacy in preventing acute reject
ion episodes in most renal, pancreas-kidney, liver and heart transplant rec
ipients. However, there are indications of superior efficacy for tacrolimus
in some trials, particularly in the prevention of severe acute rejection a
nd in Black transplant recipients. Current 12-month data also indicate equi
valent efficacy of sirolimus in renal transplantation.
Conversion from the oil-based to microemulsion formulation in stable renal,
liver and heart transplant recipients is achievable with no change in acut
e rejection rates. The addition of an anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclona
l antibody and/or mycophenolate mofetil to cyclosporin microemulsion plus c
orticosteroids decreases rates of acute rejection; corticosteroid withdrawa
l without increased acute rejection rates was also achieved on the addition
of these agents in some trials.
Pharmacoeconomic analyses have shown savings in direct healthcare costs in
kidney or liver transplantation when cyclosporin microemulsion is used in p
reference to the oil-based formulation, although studies incorporating indi
rect costs or expressing costs in terms of therapeutic outcomes are current
ly unavailable.
Conclusions: The introduction of cyclosporin microemulsion has consolidated
the place of the drug as a mainstay of therapy in all types of solid organ
transplantation; research into optimisation of outcomes through more effec
tive therapeutic monitoring in patients receiving this formulation is ongoi
ng. Several novel immunosuppressants have been introduced in recent years:
further clinical and pharmacoeconomic research will be needed to clarify th
e relative positioning of these agents, particularly with respect to specif
ic patient groups. Other new drugs (basiliximab/daclizumab and mycophenolat
e mofetil) offer particular advantages when used in combination with cyclos
porin.