The establishment of a robust national fuels mapping program must be based
on pertinent lessons from relevant national mapping programs. Many large-ar
ea mapping programs are under way in numerous Federal agencies. Each of the
se programs follows unique strategies to achieve mapping goals and objectiv
es. Implementation approaches range from highly centralized programs that u
se tightly integrated standards and dedicated staff, to dispersed programs
that permit considerable flexibility. One model facilitates national consis
tency, while the other allows accommodation of locally relevant conditions
and issues. An examination of the programmatic strategies of four national
vegetation and land cover mapping initiatives can identify the unique appro
aches, accomplishments, and lessons of each that should be considered in th
e design of a national fuel mapping program. The first three programs are t
he US. Geological Survey Gap Analysis Program, the U.S. Geological Survey N
ational Land Cover Characterization Program, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Survey National Wetlands Inventory. A fourth program, the interagency Mult
iresolution Land Characterization Program, offers insights in the use of pa
rtnerships to accomplish mapping goals. Collectively, the programs provide
lessons, guiding principles, and other basic concepts that can be used to d
esign a successful national fuels mapping initiative.