J. Gillard et al., Diagnosing thoracic outlet syndrome: contribution of provocative tests, ultrasonography, electrophysiology, and helical computed tomography in 48 patients, JOINT BONE, 68(5), 2001, pp. 416-424
Objective. To evaluate the diagnostic usefulness of provocative tests, Dopp
ler ultrasonography, electrophysiological investigations, and helical compu
ted tomography (CT) angiography in thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). Patients
and methods. We prospectively evaluated 48 patients with a clinical suspic
ion of thoracic outlet syndrome. Standardized provocative tests, an electro
myogram and somatosensory evoked responses, a Doppler ultrasonogram, and a
helical CT arterial and/or venous angiogram with dynamic maneuvers were don
e on each patient. The final diagnosis was established by excluding all oth
er causes based on all available data. The agreement between the results of
each investigation and the final diagnosis was evaluated. Results. Provoca
tive tests had mean sensitivity and specificity values of 72% and 53%, resp
ectively, with better values for the Adson test (positive predictive value
[PPV], 85%), the hyperabduction test (PPV, 92%), and the Wright test. Using
several tests in combination improved specificity. Doppler ultrasonography
visualized vascular parietal abnormalities and confirmed the diagnosis in
patients with at least five positive provocative tests. Electrophysiologica
l studies were useful mainly for the differential diagnosis or for detectin
g concomitant abnormalities. Although helical CT angiography provided accur
ate information on the location and mechanism of vascular compression, the
usefulness of this investigation for establishing the diagnosis of TOS and
for obtaining pretherapeutic information remains unclear. Joint Bone Spine
2001; 68 : 416-24. (C) 2001 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SA
S.