We have measured the specific heat vs. temperature in fields to 20 T of UPd
2Al3 in order to try to determine the reason for the disagreement in the ma
gnetic phase diagram as determined by magnetization and X-ac vs. resistivit
y measurements, with the resistivity measurements showing the magnetic anom
aly trending towards T = 0 as H --> H-metamag. Our data show a slight monot
onic suppression of TN with increasing field in agreement with both previou
s magnetoresistance and magnetization data until H --> H-metamag. However,
as field exceeds 17 T the specific heat shows a peak (presumably in a narro
w field range connected with both antiferromagnetism and the H > H-metamag
magnetization anomaly) that is suppressed with further increases infield no
lower in temperature than 11.7 K (in contrast to the feature in the magnet
oresistivity which, e.g., occurs at 8.4 K in 18 T) before it starts to move
up in temperature with increasing field at H greater than or equal to 18 T
(H-metamag). Possible causes of the specific heat anomaly for H > H-metama
g, as well as for the discrepancy, between the specific heat and the resist
ivity as H --> H-metamag, are discussed.