In this paper, I show that persons reach unanimous opinions even when they
have different initial opinions and different social influences in social i
nfluence networks. Friedkin and Johnsen introduced a model of social influe
nce networks, and identified conditions for initially diverse opinions to c
onverge. However, they did not examine conditions of "unanimous" convergenc
e. Hence, I provide sufficient conditions of such unanimous consensus by fo
cusing on three typical but conflicting social influences: the equal influe
nce, the influence of the lowest opinion, and no influence. I show that una
nimous opinions occur even when persons have antagonistic social influences
such as the equal influence and the influence of the lowest opinion. I als
o demonstrate that the most cooperative type is the equal influence, but th
e most central type is the no influence.