Sl. Dixon et Km. Merz, One-dimensional molecular representations and similarity calculations: Methodology and validation, J MED CHEM, 44(23), 2001, pp. 3795-3809
Drug discovery research is increasingly dedicated to biological screening o
n a massive scale, which seems to imply a basic rejection of many computer-
assisted techniques originally designed to add rationality to the early sta
ges of discovery. While ever-faster and more clever 3D methodologies contin
ue to be developed and rejected as alternatives to indiscriminant screening
, simpler tools based on 2D structure have carved a stable niche in the hig
h-throughput paradigm of drug discovery. Their staying power is due in no s
mall part to simplicity, ease of use, and demonstrated ability to explain s
tructure-activity data. This observation led us to wonder whether an even s
impler view of structure might offer an advantage over existing 2D and 3D m
ethods. Accordingly, we introduce 1D representations of chemical structure,
which are generated by collapsing a 3D molecular model or a 2D chemical gr
aph onto a single coordinate of atomic positions. Atoms along this coordina
te are differentiated according to elemental type, hybridization, and conne
ctivity. By aligning 1D representations to match up identical atom types, a
measure of overall structural similarity is afforded. In extensive structu
re-activity validation tests, 1D similarities consistently outperform both
Daylight 2D fingerprints and Cerius(2) pharmacophore fingerprints, suggesti
ng that this new, simple means of representing and comparing structures may
offer a significant advantage over existing tried-and-true methods.