Binding characteristics of hydrophobic ethoxylated urethane (HEUR) and an anionic surfactant: Microcalorimetry and laser light scattering studies

Citation
S. Dai et al., Binding characteristics of hydrophobic ethoxylated urethane (HEUR) and an anionic surfactant: Microcalorimetry and laser light scattering studies, J PHYS CH B, 105(42), 2001, pp. 10189-10196
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
ISSN journal
15206106 → ACNP
Volume
105
Issue
42
Year of publication
2001
Pages
10189 - 10196
Database
ISI
SICI code
1520-6106(20011025)105:42<10189:BCOHEU>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The binding behaviors of an anionic surfactant, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS ), to an associative polymer, hydrophobic ethoxylated urethane (HEUR) were studied by isothermal titration calorimetric (ITC) and laser light scatteri ng (LLS) techniques. Static and dynamic light scattering results suggest th at HEUR polymers form flowerlike micelles with an average aggregation numbe r of about 20. Isothermal titration calorimetric studies of SDS and HEUR so lutions were conducted by varying both the concentrations of SDS and HEUR. For the titration of SDS into HEUR solutions, the thermograms display an en dothermic peak after the critical aggregation concentration (cac), followed by an exothermic peak that eventually merges with the SDS dilution curve. The endothermic and exothermic peaks are interpreted by different binding m echanisms at different surfactant concentrations. Although the values of ca c are independent of HEUR concentrations, the saturation concentration C-2 is strongly dependent on HEUR concentrations. With increasing HEUR concentr ations, C-2 increases proportionately. Dynamic light scattering results cor roborate with the findings from ITC studies. The apparent hydrodynamic radi i increase with increasing SDS concentrations for cac < CDSDS< C-2, and rem ained constant at C-SDS > C-2. However, the thermograms for titration of HE UR into SDS micellar solutions differ from those of titrating SDS into HEUR , suggesting that different binding mechanism must be in operation. The bin ding enthalpy changes increase With SDS concentration and decrease with HEU R concentration when titrating HEUR into SDS solutions.