We consider a politician's choice of whether to be evaluated, either by sub
jecting himself to a detailed interview or by asking for the appointment of
a special prosecutor. If politicians are risk-neutral, then in equilibrium
all choose to be evaluated. If politicians are risk-averse, then whether w
hen they do or do not know the quality of their own actions, stable equilib
ria may exist in which politicians can avoid evaluation, or prefer evaluati
on by a body which can poorly discriminate between good and bad actions. Th
e ability of voters to distinguish between good and bad politicians may the
refore be limited.