Jm. Spencer et al., DOES INFLAMMATION CONTRIBUTE TO THE ERADICATION OF BASAL-CELL CARCINOMA FOLLOWING CURETTAGE AND ELECTRODESICCATION, Dermatologic surgery, 23(8), 1997, pp. 625-630
BACKGROUND. Curettage and electrodesiccation (C&D) is probably the tec
hnique most frequently utilized by dermatologists to treat basal cell
carcinomas (BCC). From histologic studies, it appears C&D does not com
pletely mechanically remove all nests of BCC in a substantial number o
f cases. Nevertheless, the reported 5-year reoccurrence rate following
C&D is significantly less than this histologically observed residual
tumor frequency immediately following C&D. Among the multiple possibil
ities that exist to explain why these residual nests do not appear as
recurrent tumor more frequently is the theory that inflammation develo
ping after C&D clears residual tumor. OBJECTIVE. TO test the hypothesi
s that inflammation developing after C&D clears residual tumor not mec
hanically removed by the procedure. METHODS. The frequency of residual
BCC detected histologically immediately following CBD was compared wi
th the frequency 1 month after the C&D, an amount of time in which an
effect (if any) of inflammation could occur. RESULTS. Twenty-two of 29
primary BCC < 1 cm treated by C&D were tumor free immediately followi
ng the procedure (clearance rate, 75.9%). Eleven of 14 primary BCC <1
cm treated by C&D then allowed to granulate 2 month before excision an
d histologic analysis were tumor free, for a clearance rate of 78.6%.
Examination of larger tumors immediately following C&D revealed size i
s a significant variable for clearance rates. Eleven primary BCC >1 cm
but <2 cm were examined histologically immediately following C&D; onl
y three were tumor free for a clearance rate of 27.3%. Only one of fiv
e tumors >2 cm thus treated was tumor free, for a clearance rate of 20
%. Nine recurrent BCC of various sizes were treated by CBD and immedia
tely examined histologically. Two were tumor free for a clearance rate
of 22.2%. Two recurrent BCC were allowed to heal 1 month following C&
D; one of these was tumor free when excised. CONCLUSION. For primary B
CC <2 cm, no evidence was found that inflammation occurring over 2 mon
th following C&D clears residual tumor. It was also noted that C&D fai
ls to completely remove tumor in a large majority of primary BCC >1 cm
, and in recurrent BCC. (C) 1997 by the American Society for Dermatolo
gic Surgery, Inc.