J. Schul et W. Schulze, Phonotaxis during walking and flight: are differences in selectivity due to predation pressure?, NATURWISSEN, 88(10), 2001, pp. 438-442
Female selectivity was tested in Tettigonia viridissima during two differen
t phonotaxis situations; compensated walking and tethered flight. For two o
f the three temporal parameters that are important for call recognition in
T viridissima, selectivity was similar in the two situations. Selectivity f
or the third parameter (minimum interval duration between the double pulses
) was much higher during walking than during flight: walking females respon
ded only to stimuli with intervals of 28 ms or longer, while call models wi
th intervals of 18 ms were attractive during flight. One interneuron (TN-1)
is probably involved in filtering the minimum interval duration. As this n
euron is also the most likely candidate for transmitting bat calls during f
light, it is suggested that the selectivity differences between walking and
flying might be due to the need for detecting predator signals during flig
ht, when TN-1 would be occupied listening for bats. With TN-1 unavailable f
or song processing during flight, temporal selectivity for the minimum inte
rval duration should be reduced, as was found here.