lndividual and population levels of fluctuating asymmetry (FA) often correl
ate positively with estimates of environmental and genetic stress. These re
lationships have promoted the widely-held belief that organisms with enhanc
ed FA levels may act as sensitive biomonitors in natural populations under
threat. However, a number of recent papers have challenged this concept by
revealing major inconsistencies in the reported asymmetry-stress associatio
n. By reviewing published results from our study of patterns of bilateral t
rait asymmetry in seven Kenyan bird species, we test three hypotheses criti
cal to the use of FA as stress monitor. Given the highly congruent findings
across species and traits, we conclude that population FA-if accurately me
asured and analysed-can function as a valuable tool in conservation. We fur
ther discuss three potential causes for some of the inconsistencies reporte
d in the literature.