LEVOFLOXACIN VERSUS CIPROFLOXACIN, FLUCLOXACILLIN, OR VANCOMYCIN FOR TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL ENDOCARDITIS DUE TO METHICILLIN-SUSCEPTIBLE OR METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS
Jm. Entenza et al., LEVOFLOXACIN VERSUS CIPROFLOXACIN, FLUCLOXACILLIN, OR VANCOMYCIN FOR TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTAL ENDOCARDITIS DUE TO METHICILLIN-SUSCEPTIBLE OR METHICILLIN-RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 41(8), 1997, pp. 1662-1667
Levofloxacin is the L isomer of ofloxacin, a racemic mixture in which
the L stereochemical form carries the antimicrobial activity. Levoflox
acin is more active than former quinolones against gram-positive bacte
ria, making it potentially useful against such pathogens, In this stud
y, levofloxacin was compared to ciprofloxacin, flucloxacillin, and van
comycin for the treatment of experimental endocarditis due to two meth
icillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and two methicillin-r
esistant S, aureus (MRSA) isolates, The four test organisms were susce
ptible to ciprofloxacin, the levofloxacin MICs for the organisms were
low (0.12 to 0.25 mg/liter), and the organisms were killed in vitro bg
drug concentrations simulating both the peak and trough levels achiev
ed in human serum (5 and 0.5 mg/liter, respectively) during levofloxac
in therapy, Rats with aortic endocarditis were treated for 3 days, Ant
ibiotics were injected with a programmable pump to simulate the kineti
cs of either levofloxacin (350 mg orally once a day), ciprofloxacin (7
50 mg orally twice a day), flucloxacillin (2 g intravenously four time
s a day), or vancomycin (1 g intravenously twice a day), Levofloxacin
tended to be superior to ciprofloxacin in therapeutic experiments (P =
0.08), More importantly, levofloxacin did not select for resistance i
n the animals, in contrast to ciprofloxacin, The lower propensity of l
evofloxacin than ciprofloxacin to select for quinolone resistance was
also clearly demonstrated in vitro, Finally, the effectiveness of this
simulation of oral levofloxacin therapy was at least equivalent to th
at of standard treatment for MSSA or MRSA endocarditis with either flu
cloxacillin or vancomycin, This is noteworthy, because oral antibiotic
s are not expected to succeed in the treatment of severe staphylococca
l infections, These good results obtained with animals suggest that le
vofloxacin might deserve consideration for further study in the treatm
ent of infections due to ciprofloxacin-susceptible staphylococci in hu
mans.