Population differentiation and phenotypic plasticity of wild and agrestal populations of the annual Anoda cristata (Malvaceae) growing in two contrasting habitats
B. Rendon et J. Nunez-farfan, Population differentiation and phenotypic plasticity of wild and agrestal populations of the annual Anoda cristata (Malvaceae) growing in two contrasting habitats, PLANT ECOL, 156(2), 2001, pp. 205-213
Anoda cristata is a widely distributed annual weed in Mexico, which grows a
s agrestal or naturally in disturbed and undisturbed vegetation, respective
ly. Plants of this species are tolerated in orchards and corn-bean fields b
y Mexican ethnic groups of Central Mexico. Leaves of the plants are used as
a food source, and occasionally seeds are sown in orchards. Because Mexica
ns have used Anoda cristata for a long time, it is possible that ecological
and morphological characteristics of managed populations differ from those
of wild populations. In this study, we analyzed phenotypic responses of tw
o populations of A. cristata (wild and agrestal) growing in two habitats (f
orest and cultivated field) comparing survivorship, and life history traits
. Natural progenies from wild and agrestal populations of A. cristata were
transplanted into a cultivated field and in the understory of a pine forest
in a reciprocal transplant experiment. Results showed that the habitat of
transplant and the origin of populations had significant effect on all plan
t characters measured (growth, phenology, and biomass allocation), but the
habitat x origin interaction was non-significant. In general, plants from t
he agrestal population grew faster, reproduced earlier, and allocated more
biomass to reproduction, than plants from the wild population. Similarly, s
ignificant effects of habitat and origin on plant survivorship were detecte
d, but the origin of populations explained the largest proportion of varian
ce in plant survival. Most traits were phenotypically plastic but there wer
e no differences in the magnitude or direction of the response between popu
lations. In contrast both populations showed differentiation for most chara
cter mean values. Population differentiation is possibly the result of gene
tic differences driven by processes other than incipient domestication.