Effects of amphetamine, dexfenfluramine, diazepam, and other pharmacological and dietary manipulations on food "seeking" and "taking" behavior in non-human primates
Rw. Foltin, Effects of amphetamine, dexfenfluramine, diazepam, and other pharmacological and dietary manipulations on food "seeking" and "taking" behavior in non-human primates, PSYCHOPHAR, 158(1), 2001, pp. 28-38
Rationale: Feeding consists of appetitive or foraging behavior followed by
consummatory behavior. Objectives: To determine if pharmacological manipula
tions can differentially affect appetitive and consummatory aspects of food
intake, and to compare these results to those obtained using naturalistic
dietary manipulations. Methods: Responding of baboons was studied using a s
chedule of reinforcement that simulated food "seeking" and food "taking." R
esponding during the seeking component was reinforced by stimuli paired wit
h food, while responding during the taking component was reinforced with fo
od. The effects of intramuscular amphetamine (AMPH), dexfenfluramine (DFEN)
, diethylpropion (DEP), phencyclidine (PCP), diazepam (DZP), as well as cal
oric prefeeding and acute food deprivation were determined. Results: AMPH d
ecreased food taking and increased food seeking, DEP decreased food taking
without affecting food seeking, DFEN and PCP decreased both food taking and
food seeking, while DZP increased both food taking and food seeking. Calor
ic prefeeding decreased food taking and increased food seeking, i.e., resem
bled AMPH. while acute deprivation increased both food taking and food seek
ing, i.e., resembled DZP. Conclusions: Manipulations that increase dopamine
turnover. such as AMPH, increase food seeking, while decreasing food intak
e. In contrast, manipulations that increase serotonin turnover. such as DFE
N, decrease both food seeking and food taking.