Going to ground: Argument in Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian encounter groups

Authors
Citation
I. Maoz et Dg. Ellis, Going to ground: Argument in Israeli-Jewish and Palestinian encounter groups, RES LANG S, 34(4), 2001, pp. 399-419
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Communication
Journal title
RESEARCH ON LANGUAGE AND SOCIAL INTERACTION
ISSN journal
08351813 → ACNP
Volume
34
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
399 - 419
Database
ISI
SICI code
0835-1813(2001)34:4<399:GTGAII>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The focus of this article is the management of arguments between Israeli Je ws and Palestinian Arabs, Israelis and Palestinians are 2 groups that have been in severe conflict about land, culture, history, and national rights. In this study we draw on the traditions of conversation analysis, logic, an d rhetoric to explain how participants used arguments to manage certain dil emmas and problems. The data were group encounters between Israeli Jews and Palestinians. This analysis highlights the role of symbolic ethnocentrism in argument, the problem of grounded premises that forestall progress, and various argumentative strategies (e.g., question asking, collaborative argu ment, limited topical space) that serve the rhetorical goals of the partici pants.