The focus of this article is the management of arguments between Israeli Je
ws and Palestinian Arabs, Israelis and Palestinians are 2 groups that have
been in severe conflict about land, culture, history, and national rights.
In this study we draw on the traditions of conversation analysis, logic, an
d rhetoric to explain how participants used arguments to manage certain dil
emmas and problems. The data were group encounters between Israeli Jews and
Palestinians. This analysis highlights the role of symbolic ethnocentrism
in argument, the problem of grounded premises that forestall progress, and
various argumentative strategies (e.g., question asking, collaborative argu
ment, limited topical space) that serve the rhetorical goals of the partici
pants.