Js. Evans et al., Reproductive and developmental risks from ethylene oxide: A probabilistic characterization of possible regulatory thresholds, RISK ANAL, 21(4), 2001, pp. 697-717
Ethylene oxide is a gas produced in large quantities in the United States t
hat is used primarily as a chemical intermediate in the production of ethyl
ene glycol, propylene glycol, nonionic surfactants, ethanolamines, glycol e
thers, and other chemicals. It has been well established that ethylene oxid
e can induce cancer, genetic, reproductive and developmental, and acute hea
lth effects in animals. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is current
ly developing both a cancer potency factor and a reference concentration (R
fC) for ethylene oxide. This study used the rich database on the reproducti
ve and developmental effects of ethylene oxide to develop a probabilistic c
haracterization of possible regulatory thresholds for ethylene oxide. This
analysis was based on the standard regulatory approach for noncancer risk a
ssessment, but involved several innovative elements, such as: (1) the use o
f advanced statistical methods to account for correlations in developmental
outcomes among littermates and allow for simultaneous control of covariate
s (Such as litter size); (2) the application of a probabilistic approach fo
r characterizing the uncertainty in extrapolating the animal results to hum
ans; and (3) the use of a quantitative approach to account for the variatio
n in heterogeneity among the human population. This article presents severa
l classes of results, including: (1) probabilistic characterizations of ED(
10)s for two quantal reproductive outcomes-resorption and fetal death, (2)
probabilistic characterizations of one developmental outcome-the dose expec
ted to yield a 5% reduction in fetal (or pup) weight, (3) estimates of the
RfCs that would result from using these values in the standard regulatory a
pproach for noncancer risk assessment, and (4) a probabilistic characteriza
tion of the level of ethylene oxide exposure that would be expected to yiel
d a 1/1000 increase in the risk of reproductive or developmental outcomes i
n exposed human populations.