Evaluation of interviewing techniques to enhance recall of sexual and druginjection partners

Citation
Dd. Brewer et Sb. Garrett, Evaluation of interviewing techniques to enhance recall of sexual and druginjection partners, SEX TRA DIS, 28(11), 2001, pp. 666-677
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease","da verificare
Journal title
SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES
ISSN journal
01485717 → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
666 - 677
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-5717(200111)28:11<666:EOITTE>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
Background: People with multiple sex partners forget a significant proporti on of their partners, and drug injectors forget a large proportion of the p ersons with whom they inject drugs. This incomplete reporting poses a probl em for partner notification and social network research on infectious disea se. Goal: To evaluate supplementary interviewing techniques to enhance recall o f sex and injection partners. Study Design: One hundred thirty-nine persons at high risk for HIV particip ated in a randomized trial of interviewing techniques. After participants f reely recalled their partners, interviewers administered one of five techni ques to elicit partners who might have been forgotten. Four experimental te chniques involved cues (locations, role relationships, personal timeline, a nd partners recalled prior to cues) developed from memory research. Alphabe tic cues served as a control technique. To assess the cumulative effects of the techniques, all five techniques were administered to another 19 partic ipants. Results: In the randomized trial, the techniques varied moderately in effec tiveness and time efficiency. When administered as a set, the five techniqu es increased the number of sex and injection partners elicited by 40% and 1 23%, respectively, on average. The techniques were most effective with indi viduals who recalled many partners before the cues and/or sensed they might be forgetting partners. The available evidence indicates cue-elicited part ners are as valid as partners recalled before the cues. On epidemiologicall y significant variables, cue-elicited partners also are similar to partners recalled before the cues. Conclusion: The supplementary techniques counteract forgetting appreciably and may promote more effective partner notification and more complete descr iption of risk networks.