Overviews are presented of the University of Melbourne Child Growth St
udy and of the Fels Longitudinal Study; each of these studies had a ma
jor focus on the growth and maturation of children. Planning, study de
sign, logistics and staffing varied between these studies, but each le
d to exciting research opportunities that can exist only when longitud
inal data are available. There are important differences between these
studies in the types of participants, ages at examinations, the varia
bles measured, some topics of central concern, and in funding. In each
study, research productivity was low in the early years, the retentio
n of participants was a major concern, and it was necessary to maintai
n a balance between data collection, data management, and data analysi
s. More such studies are needed that focus on particular population gr
oups and topic areas and that utilize the lessons of the past to maxim
ize the chances of future success.