G. Ansalone et al., Doppler myocardial imaging in patients with heart failure receiving biventricular pacing treatment, AM HEART J, 142(5), 2001, pp. 881-896
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Background In patients with heart failure, biventricular pacing (BIV) impro
ves left ventricular (LV) performance by counteracting LV unsynchronized co
ntraction caused by the presence of left bundle branch block (LBBB). Howeve
r, no data are yet available on regional long-axis function in patients wit
h LBBB or on BIV effectiveness in improving such a function in patients wit
h heart failure and LBBB.
Methods and Results We studied with standard 2D echocardiography and tissue
Doppler imaging (TDI) 21 nonischemic patients in New York Heart Associatio
n (NYHA) class III-IV, with LBBB and QRS greater than or equal to 120 ms, r
eceiving BIV. To assess long-axis function, TDI qualitative analysis at the
basal level of each LV wall was performed in M-mode color and pulsed wave
Doppler modalities before and after BIV. By analysis of the interventricula
r septum, the inferior, posterior, lateral, and anterior walls, of 105 basa
l segments, the following electromechanical patterns were identified: norma
l (pattern I), mildly unsynchronized (pattern IIA), severely unsynchronized
(pattern IIB), reversed early in systole (pattern IIIA); reversed late in
systole (pattern IIIB), and reversed throughout all the systole (pattern IV
). After BIV, (1) 49 (46.7%) of 105 segments showed unsynchronized contract
ion of the same degree as before; (2) 36 (34.3%) of 105 and 20 (19%) of 105
showed unsynchronized contraction of lesser and greater degree, respective
ly, than before; and (3) a preexcitation pattern was found in 1 1 (10.5%) o
f 105, but no segment with pattern IV was observed. According to TDI analys
is, patients were divided into group 1 (10 of 21), with less severe LV asyn
chrony than before BIV, and group 2 (11 of 21), with no change or more seve
re LV asynchrony than before BIV. In group 1, (1) the LV ejection fraction
increased significantly (P = .01); (2) the exercise tolerance, expressed as
time and work capacity on the bicycle stress testing, increased significan
tly (P = .01, P = .003, respectively); (3) the 6-minute walked distance inc
reased significantly (P = .01); and (4) the NYHA class decreased significan
tly (P = .003). In group 2, no significant differences were found either in
LV ejection fraction, in NYHA class, or in exercise tolerance data (P = no
t significant for all). Conversely, the QRS narrowing was significant in bo
th groups (P = .003 in group 1 and P = .01 in group 2).
Conclusions TDI is useful in assessing the severity of LV asynchrony in pat
ients with LBBB with heart failure as well as in evaluating the pacing effe
cts on long-axis function in these patients. BIV reduced unsynchronized and
/or dyskinetic contraction in at least one third of the LV basal segments,
whereas it induced preexcitation in approximately 10%. Such changes were re
sponsible for better. LV synchrony in approximately one half of patients. A
fter BIV, LV performance improved significantly in patients with better LV
synchrony evaluated by TDI, whereas the QRS narrowing was not predictive of
this functional improvement.