In army ants, prey items are often retrieved by cooperative teams of worker
s rather than by single porters. We used experiments and randomization test
s to explore the division of labour within such teams in the New World army
ant Eciton burchelli, and the Old World army ant Dorylus wilverthi. We eva
luated these teams in the light of a recent proposal that teams should be d
efined in terms of the concurrent performance of different subtasks by thei
r members. This is a broader and more useful definition of teams than a pre
vious one in which teams were defined by a membership necessarily involving
different castes. Within army ant teams there is a front runner who initia
tes prey retrieval and one or more followers. Hence, there are two qualitat
ively different subtasks that must be performed concurrently during such te
amwork. Previous work has shown that these teams are superefficient: the co
mbined weight of the prey retrieved by the team is greater than the sum of
the maximum weights the team members could carry when working singly. Here
we show, for both species of army ant, that such teams have a nonrandom com
position of members. The front runner is typically unusually large and the
second-largest ant in a team is typically unusually small. These analyses a
re based on worker dry weights rather than assigning, workers to discrete c
aste categories. Our analysis also suggests that the behaviour of army ants
is more sophisticated then previously suspected. Our data imply that if an
unnecessarily large supplementary ant (follower) tries to help the front r
unner to move a large prey item, but finds that the remaining work is too s
light to use her full efforts, she does not join the team. One or more smal
ler ants whose efforts become fully employed become involved instead. This
suggests that army ants engaged in teamwork have both upper and lower workl
oad thresholds. (C) 2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.