Tn. Sherratt et Mr. Forbes, Sexual differences in coloration of Coenagrionid damselflies (Odonata): a case of intraspecific aposematism?, ANIM BEHAV, 62, 2001, pp. 653-660
Sexual dimorphism is commonly explained as a consequence of selection on tr
aits that increase male attractiveness to females, or simply allow males gr
eater access to females. Here, we consider another explanation for sexual d
ifferences in coloration within species of the damselfly family Coenagrioni
dae (Odonata: Zygoptera). In many of these species, males are more brightly
coloured than females and have different patterns. Yet they are nonterrito
rial and do not engage in displays: indeed, male competition for mates ofte
n resembles a scramble. We therefore argue that even if females show a degr
ee of mate choice, then it is unlikely to be based on colour or pattern. In
stead, we suggest that sexual dimorphism has evolved in this group primaril
y as a form of sex-related warning coloration. First, we argue that it is a
lmost inevitable that male-male interactions will incur a small cost to bot
h participants. We then provide some evidence that males are capable of usi
ng colour as a clue to sexual identity. Using a simple model, we show that
if these conditions hold, then sexual dimorphism will readily evolve. Furth
ermore, the model shows that if females are selected to avoid excessive har
assment by males as is often suggested, then males should evolve much brigh
ter coloration than females. If the assumptions underlying our 'unprofitabl
e mate' model are broadly correct, then not only does it offer a novel expl
anation for sexual dimorphism, but it also provides the first case example
of the evolution of aposematism as a result of intraspecific interactions.
(C) 2001 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.