Lpr. Decraene et Ef. Smets, Floral developmental evidence for the systematic relationships of Tropaeolum (Tropaeolaceae), ANN BOTANY, 88(5), 2001, pp. 879-892
The floral ontogeny of three species of Tropaeolum was studied using scanni
ng electron microscopy to find morphological evidence for discussing the sy
stematic position of the family. The initiation of the androecium is highly
unusual: there are always eight stamens which arise (1) either in a spiral
sequence starting with the stamen opposite sepal four, running in a direct
ion opposite to the sequence of the sepals, and with reversals in the direc
tion of the spiral, or (2) as a sequence of paired and unpaired stamens. Th
e floral symmetry changes twice during the development of the flower, from
polysymmetrical at sepal and petal initiation, through oblique monosymmetry
at stamen initiation, and ending with median monosymmetry in later develop
mental stages. The occurrence of median monosymmetry is a late-developmenta
l event and is caused by the initiation of a hypanthial spur, and the unequ
al growth of the petals and styles. The origin for the unusual sequence of
stamen initiation reflects a trend affecting the whole flower which is link
ed with the changing patterns of floral symmetry. Octandry is enhanced by m
ultiple causes, such as the loss of two stamens in an originally diplostemo
nous androecium and the regulating pressure of the gynoecium. The change in
symmetry during ontogeny is significant for discussing the systematic posi
tion of Tropaeolaceae in comparison with the glucosinolate-producing taxa a
nd the Sapindales. The combination of an androecium with eight stamens and
oblique monosymmetry is either a single event in evolution and links Tropae
olum with the Sapindales, or it has evolved at least twice, once in the Sap
indales, and once in a clade comprising Tropaeolaceae, Akaniaceae and Brets
chneideraceae. Morphological data support a sister group relationship of th
e three latter families, which is in line with macromolecular studies. (C)
2001 Annals of Botany Company.