We used a modified narrow phonetic transcription procedure to examine a spe
ech sample produced by 10 speakers with coexisting aphasia and apraxia of s
peech. The transcription protocol was limited to eight diacritic marks sele
cted based on previous perceptual descriptions of phonetic distortion among
speakers with pure apraxia of speech. Additionally, there was one general
distortion category for perceived distortions not captured by the main diac
ritic marks. The results showed that distortion errors were as common as su
bstitution errors, that vowel and consonant segments were equally vulnerabl
e to misproduction, and that there was no difference between the frequency
of consonants produced incorrectly in prevocalic and postvocalic syllable p
ositions. Among distortion errors, 32% were classified as segment prolongat
ions and 41% were classified as general distortions. An independent transcr
iption that used a comprehensive system of diacritic marks was performed as
a follow-up. Most general distortions were not further specified by the co
mprehensive transcription system. A phonetic contrast analysis of errors de
tected at the broad transcription level yielded different speech characteri
stics from the observed distortion errors, but were in general corresponden
ce with previously reported error patterns in intelligibility testing of th
e same speech sample. The results are discussed relative to the role of sin
gle word intelligibility testing in aphasia and apraxia of speech assessmen
t and the challenges associated with transcribing disordered speech.