m-benzyne and bicyclo[3.1.0]hexatriene - which isomer is more stable? - a quantum chemical investigation

Citation
E. Kraka et al., m-benzyne and bicyclo[3.1.0]hexatriene - which isomer is more stable? - a quantum chemical investigation, CHEM P LETT, 348(1-2), 2001, pp. 115-125
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Physical Chemistry/Chemical Physics
Journal title
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS
ISSN journal
00092614 → ACNP
Volume
348
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
115 - 125
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-2614(20011102)348:1-2<115:MAB-WI>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT) predicts that bicyclo[3.1.0]hexatriene (2) is more stable than its isomer m-benzyne (1). Hess [Eur. J. Org. Chem. (200 1) 2185] has argued that experimental findings suggesting 1 can equally or even better be associated with 2. However, high level ab initio calculation s (CCSD(T), CASPT2) show that 2 does not exist and that the previously meas ured infrared spectrum is correctly assigned to 1. Bond stretch isomers are possible for p-benzynes but not for m-benzynes. The electrophilic characte r of m-benzynes: is in line with 1 but not with 2. (C) 2001 Elsevier Scienc e B.V. All rights reserved.