ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF REGIONAL AND GLOBAL LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION - WALL-MOTION SCORING IN PARASTERNAL AND APICAL VIEWS VERSUS APICAL VIEWS ALONE
S. Ali et al., ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT OF REGIONAL AND GLOBAL LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION - WALL-MOTION SCORING IN PARASTERNAL AND APICAL VIEWS VERSUS APICAL VIEWS ALONE, Echocardiography, 14(4), 1997, pp. 313-320
The aim of the study was to examine the value of echocardiographic wal
l-motion scoring in apical views as compared to a conventional combina
tion of apical and parasternal views. In 50 consecutive patients refer
red to coronary arteriography for potential revascularization, echocar
diographic digital image loops of the left ventricle (LV) were recorde
d in parasternal long- and short-axis views and in apical long-axis, t
wo-, and four-chamber views. Eight of 16 standardized LV segments appe
ar both in the apical and in the parasternal views (group 1 segments).
The remaining eight segments are visualized in the apical views only
(group 2). Using a cross-over design, two cardiologists independently
performed regional wall-motion scoring based on apical views, respecti
vely, based on the combination of parasternal and apical views. Using
the conventional approach (parasternal and apical views) 98% of the to
tal 800 segments were scored as compared to 95% when using the mere ap
ical approach (P < 0.05); 94% of the 800 segments were scored from bot
h approaches. The regional wall-motion score was identical in 76% of g
roup 1 segments and in 77% of group 2 segments. It diverged, at most,
one score in 94% of group I segments and in 91% of group 2 segments (P
> 0.05). LV ejection fraction (EF) calculated on the basis of average
wall-motion score exclusively assessed from the apex differed little
from angiographic EF (mean difference 2.0%, 95% confidence limits +/-
6.6%). 0 Intraobserver variability of wall-motion scores (n = 25 patie
nts) was small and almost identical for the two cardiologists. Similar
ly, interobserver variability was small and identical for apical views
and conventional views. We conclude that there is no substantial loss
of information when echocardiographic evaluation of regional and glob
al left ventricular function is performed solely from the apical appro
ach.