TRANSTHORACIC VERSUS TRANSESOPHAGEAL 2-DIMENSIONAL ECHO-DOPPLER DETERMINATION OF FLOW VELOCITY IN THE LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE

Citation
C. Carranza et al., TRANSTHORACIC VERSUS TRANSESOPHAGEAL 2-DIMENSIONAL ECHO-DOPPLER DETERMINATION OF FLOW VELOCITY IN THE LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE, Echocardiography, 14(4), 1997, pp. 357-361
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
Journal title
ISSN journal
07422822
Volume
14
Issue
4
Year of publication
1997
Pages
357 - 361
Database
ISI
SICI code
0742-2822(1997)14:4<357:TVT2ED>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The assessment of flow velocity (FV) in the left atrial appendage (LAA ) by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been reported to be a useful tool as a high risk marker for systemic emboli. The analysis of FV in LAA by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has not yet been va lidated. The purpose of this study teas to compare FV measurements in the LAA by TEE and TTE in 30 consecutive patients (age 19-87 years, me an = 55) sent for echocardiographic study with the following diagnosis : stroke (II patients), mitral stenosis (6 patients), congenital heart disease (4 patients), mitral prosthetic function assessment (2 patien ts), and other pathologies (7 patients). FV was measured at the outlet and mid-portion of the LAA with TTE, from the apical two-chamber view and with biplane TEE, from the longitudinal two-chamber view. Satisfa ctory measurements were obtained with TTE from the outlet of the LAA i n 96.7% and from the mid-portion of the LAA in 90% of patients. One th ird of patients were in atrial fibrillation (AF) during the study. The mean FV in the outlet of the LAA was 32.7 +/- 2.5 (SE) cm/sec with TT E and was 33.7 +/- 3.04 (SE) cm/sec with TEE (r = 0.95). The mean FV i n the mid-portion of the LAA was 40.9 +/- 3.3 and 42.7 +/- 3.9 with TT E and TEE respectively (P = NS) (r = 0.95). There was no difference in the LAA FV determination by TTE and TEE in the subgroup with AF. TTE was able to detect FV < 30 cm/sec with a sensitivity of 88% and specif icity of 81% and a positive predictive value of 84% compared with TEE.