Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?

Citation
J. Aramaki et al., Which bioengineering assay is appropriate for irritant patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate?, CONTACT DER, 45(5), 2001, pp. 286-290
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Dermatology
Journal title
CONTACT DERMATITIS
ISSN journal
01051873 → ACNP
Volume
45
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
286 - 290
Database
ISI
SICI code
0105-1873(200111)45:5<286:WBAIAF>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
For testing with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS), measurements of transepiderm al water loss (TEWL) and cutaneous blood flow with laser Doppler (LD) are c onsidered to be the most reliable methods. The aim of this study was to det ermine which method of measurement should be preferred when conducting SLS testing under varying conditions. Patch testing with SLS at different conce ntrations and exposure times was performed. TEWL values were compared with those of LD. TEWL values showed distinct changes at low SLS concentrations and short application periods. By contrast, higher SLS concentrations were necessary to increase LD values. Short application of patches changed TEWL rather than LD values. When evaluating SLS patch testing by bioengineering methods, TEWL measurement appears to be more suitable for a test procedure that provokes mild skin reactions (SLS concentration <1%), whereas LD measu rement is more appropriate to evaluate pronounced skin reactions (SLS conce ntration greater than or equal to1%).