Open, multicenter comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day oral contraceptive regimen with 20 mu g ethinyl estradiol and 75 mu g gestodene and a 21-day regimen with 20 mu g ethinyl estradiol and 150 mu g desogestrel

Citation
J. Endrikat et al., Open, multicenter comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day oral contraceptive regimen with 20 mu g ethinyl estradiol and 75 mu g gestodene and a 21-day regimen with 20 mu g ethinyl estradiol and 150 mu g desogestrel, CONTRACEPT, 64(3), 2001, pp. 201-207
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine","da verificare
Journal title
CONTRACEPTION
ISSN journal
00107824 → ACNP
Volume
64
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
201 - 207
Database
ISI
SICI code
0010-7824(200109)64:3<201:OMCOEC>2.0.ZU;2-0
Abstract
This prospective, open, randomized study was conducted to compare the contr aceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day regimen w ith 20 mug ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 75 mug gestodene (GSD) and a 21-day r egimen with 20 mug EE and 150 pg desogestrel (DSG). Participants took eithe r 23 tablets with active substances plus 5 placebo tablets (23-day EE/GSD) or 21 tablets with active substances followed by 7 days without pill-taking (21-day EE/DSG). Contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability w ere evaluated over a period of seven cycles. Efficacy data gathered from 59 67 treatment cycles (23-day EE/GSD: 2975 cycles; 21-day EE/DSG: 2992 cycles ) were obtained from 890 participants (445 in each group). Both preparations proved to be effective contraceptives and provided good c ycle control. No pregnancy during treatment was recorded. This resulted in a study Pearl Index of 0.0 for both treatments. For 23-day EE/GSD, 32.4% of participants reported at least one intracyclic bleeding episode during Cyc les 2-4 (primary target) compared to 31.5% for 21-day EE/DSG. In the 23-day EE/GSD group, intracyclic bleeding episodes were reported by 48.8% of the participants in Cycle 1 but in only 15.1% in Cycle 7, and in the 21-day reg imen group by 43.4% in Cycle 1 and only 14.2% in Cycle 7. Overall, intracyc lic bleeding was reported in 20.9% of cycles for both treatments. A greater number of 23-day EE/GSD participants had shorter withdrawal bleed ing periods than with 21-day EE/DSG. In significantly (p <0.0001) more cycl es in the 23-day EE/GSD group participants reported withdrawal bleeding per iods that lasted only 1-4 days compared to the 21-day EE/DSG group. For the majority of the treatment cycles, the median number of bleeding days in th e 23-day EE/GSD group was 4 days and in the 21-day EE/DSG group 5 days. Both preparations were well tolerated and showed a similar adverse events p attern. The discontinuation rate because of adverse events was low (23-day EE/GSD: 6.1%; 21-day EE/DSG: 5.6%). No serious vascular adverse events were reported. More than 82% in the 23-day EE/GSD group and 79% in the 21-day E E/DSG group either lost more than 2 kg of weight or did not gain weight dur ing the study. The treatment effect on blood pressure was negligible. There were no appreciable changes in mean laboratory values over the course of t he study compared to baseline. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights re served.