Indications and impact of postoperative transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgical patients

Citation
D. Schmidlin et al., Indications and impact of postoperative transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgical patients, CRIT CARE M, 29(11), 2001, pp. 2143-2148
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00903493 → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
11
Year of publication
2001
Pages
2143 - 2148
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-3493(200111)29:11<2143:IAIOPT>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Objective., Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has gained widespread ac ceptance among intensivists as a tool to facilitate decision-making in the management of critically ill patents. This observational study analyzes the indications and impact of TEE and the outcome in patients following cardia c surgery. Design. Standardized reports containing indication, main diagnosis, and imp act on patient management were completed during TEE. Setting. Intensive care unit in a university hospital. Patients. Postoperative cardiac surgery patients requiring TEE. Interventio n. TEE in sedated and mechanically ventilated patients. Measurements and Results. Reports were obtained in 301 adult patients betwe en June 1996 and June 2000. Indications were postoperative control of left ventricular function in 102 (34%) cases; unexplained, sudden hemodynamic de terioration in 89 (29%); suspicion of pericardial tamponade in 41 (14%); ca rdiac ischemia in 26 (9%); and "other" in 43 (14%). In 136 patients (45%), a new diagnosis was established or an important pathology was excluded. Per icardial tamponade was diagnosed in 34 cases (11%) and excluded in 36 cases (12%). Other diagnoses included severe left ventricular failure, large ple ural effusion, and others. Therapeutic impact was found in 220 cases (73%): change of pharmacologic treatment and/or fluid therapy in 118 cases (40%), resternotomy in 43 (14%), no reoperation necessary in 39 (13%), and variou s in 20 (7%). No impact was found in 81 cases (27%). In a subgroup of patie nts in whom preoperative risk scores were evaluated, the indication for a p ostoperative TEE was significantly associated with a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit: 7 (5.6, 8.4) days vs. 1 (0.8, 1.2) day (median, [95% c onfidence interval]) (p < .0001), more neurologic complications (18/137 = 1 3.1% vs. 21/680 = 3.0%) (p < .0001), and increased mortality (34/153 = 22.2 % vs. 18/709 = 2.5%) (p < .0001). Corrected for preoperative risk scores, t hese differences were still significant. Conclusion: Although TEE provided important findings and therapeutic impact in postoperative cardiac surgical patients, patients with comparable preop erative risk who had postoperative TEE examinations had a significantly wor se outcome than those without the need for postoperative TEE.