Objective: There is a well-documented need for effective human UVA and UVB
photoprotection. Since there are important anatomical variations, the sun p
rotection factor (SPF) of a lipstick sunscreen was measured on the anatomic
al site intended for use. Methods: The SPF tests were performed according t
o Federal US and European COLIPA guidelines. Prior to performing a test on
the lip, the minimal erythemal dose (MED) of the unprotected back skin was
determined. Subsequently, the sunscreen SPF was measured on the anatomical
target site (lip). The evaluator was blinded with respect to scoring the SP
F of each sunscreen treatment. Individual test sites were assigned to one o
f the following treatment conditions: (1) no treatment (MED of unprotected
skin); (2) test formulation; (3) reference standard. Results: The MED on un
protected back skin was found to be 25% lower than on unprotected lip skin.
The SPF of the lipstick sunscreen was measured 2 units lower than the SPF
determined in the classical way on the back skin. Conclusion: It was hypoth
esized that the higher MED of the lower lip compared with back skin was due
to the adaptation of this tissue to the continuous exposure to UV radiatio
n. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.