French type 2 diabetic patients are underinsulinised mainly because of fear
of injections. Among all alternatives to the subcutaneous route, only the
lung has a sufficient bioavailability of 10 % without addition of promoters
. This is made possible by the large surface and thinness of the alveolo-ca
pillary barrier, and only if insulin particles have an ideal size (2-3 micr
ons). The Pfizer-Aventis-Inhale project utilises powder aerosolisation, whe
ther the Novo-Aradigm project utilises liquid nebulization. In the former p
roject, phase I studies have shown plasma kinetics similar to subcutaneous
lispro, and intrasubject reproducibility non significantly different from r
apid and lispro insulins. Phase 2 studies, performed on more than 200 insul
in-treated and non insulin-treated subjects have shown an efficacy similar
to subcutaneous insulin, with no difference in terms of side - effects (hyp
oglycaemia, weight gain) and a satisfactory 1-year local tolerance, as eval
uated by functional tests. Phase 3 studies, performed on 1400 subjects have
just been completed and are not published yet. Though results are promisin
g, some important questions remain to be clarified : long term tolerance, m
iniaturisation of the inhaler, overcost, and long-term acceptability, espec
ially in type 2 patients. It already appears that the major potential indic
ations may be ''functional" (flexible) insulin therapy of type 1 diabetes a
nd early insulinisation of type 2 patients with oral drugs failure.