H. Liberman et al., A prospective evaluation of the value of anorectal physiology in the management of fecal incontinence, DIS COL REC, 44(11), 2001, pp. 1567-1574
PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine whether anorectal physiology
testing significantly altered patient management in the setting of fecal in
continence. METHODS: Patients referred to the anorectal physiology laborato
ry for evaluation of fecal incontinence were prospectively interviewed and
examined by a colon and rectal surgeon. A decision to treat either medicall
y or surgically was reached. The patients underwent physiologic testing wit
h transanal ultrasound, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, and anorecta
l manometry. A panel of board-certified colon and rectal surgeons then revi
ewed the history and physical examination, as well as the anorectal physiol
ogy tests, of each patient and reached a consensus on management. Managemen
t plans before and after physiologic evaluation were compared. RESULTS: Nin
ety patients (6 males) were entered into the study. The patients were divid
ed in two groups: those with pretest medical management plans (n = 45) and
those with pretest surgical management plans (n = 45). A change in manageme
nt was noted in nine patients (10 percent). In the medical management group
, the management changed from medical to surgical therapy in five patients.
Transanal ultrasound detected anal sphincter defects in all patients who c
hanged from medical to surgical management but in only 10 percent of those
who remained under medical management (P = 0.0001). In the surgical managem
ent group, three patients (7 percent) changed from surgical to medical ther
apy and one patient (2 percent) changed from sphincteroplasty to neosphinct
er. Transanal ultrasound detected a limited anal sphincter defect in one pa
tient (33 percent) who changed from surgical to medical management and a si
gnificant defect in all 41 patients (100 percent) who remained under surgic
al management (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal physiology testing is use
ful in the evaluation of patients with fecal incontinence. Without the info
rmation obtained from physiologic testing, 11 percent of patients who may h
ave benefited from surgery would not have been given this option, and 7 per
cent of patients could have potentially undergone unnecessary surgery. Tran
sanal ultrasound is the study most likely to change a patient's management
plan.