Vv. Sokolov et Mm. Bagirov, Reconstructive surgery for combined tracheo-esophageal injuries and their sequelae, EUR J CAR-T, 20(5), 2001, pp. 1025-1029
Objective: To evaluate surgical options of treatment in combined tracheo-es
ophageal injuries and their sequelae and elaborate new ones. Methods: The o
verlooked diagnosis of combined tracheo-esophageal injury would lead to sev
ere stenosis of the esophagus and trachea with tracheo-esophageal fistula.
This condition requires a complex surgical intervention to be per-formed wi
th non-standard procedure in every single case. Forty patients with combine
d tracheo-esophageal injuries were treated in our institution. Nine patient
s were urgently operated while others were transferred to us from other hos
pitals with chronic sequelae of the initial trauma. Results: In the majorit
y of cases the cause of the injury was penetrating (17 patients) or iatroge
nic (13 patients) trauma followed by blunt neck and chest trauma (six patie
nts) and caustic burn (four patients). Three patients had total cut off of
the esophagus and trachea, which were repaired with end-to-end anastomoses.
Another six patients had tracheal and esophageal disruptions within one-ha
lf to three-quarters of circumference. In these cases both the trachea and
esophagus were mobilized within wall laceration and sutured by interrupted
Vicryl (R) 4/0. One of them died due to pre-existing disease. Thirty-one pa
tients with sequelae of the trauma were also operated on. In spite of the c
omplexity and extent of the tracheoesophageal stenosis and fistula the surg
ical treatment was aimed to one-stage reconstruction of both the esophagus
and trachea. For this purpose we performed an originally developed surgical
intervention, which was to be modified in accordance with patients diagnos
is. The main point of the procedure is that after mobilization of the trach
ea and esophagus we resect an involved part of the trachea, but preserve a
pedicled flap fashioned from the tracheal membrane. Then we remove the muco
sa from the flap, resect an involved esophageal wall, repair esophageal muc
osa and replace the defect of the muscular layer of the esophagus with the
tracheal flap. Then a tracheal or laryngo-tracheal anastomosis is establish
ed. There were no postoperative mortality and complications among patients
with the sequelae. Conclusion: Combined tracheo-esophageal injury requires
the precise preoperative diagnosis and well organized plan of surgical trea
tment, which may be unique for every single patient. The main purpose of th
e treatment is to restore the continuity of both the esophagus and trachea
in one-stage intervention. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserv
ed.