Experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to familial risk of breast cancer: a comparison of the views of GPs and practice nurses

Citation
Fm. Walter et al., Experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to familial risk of breast cancer: a comparison of the views of GPs and practice nurses, FAM PRACT, 18(5), 2001, pp. 491-494
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
FAMILY PRACTICE
ISSN journal
02632136 → ACNP
Volume
18
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
491 - 494
Database
ISI
SICI code
0263-2136(200110)18:5<491:EAEOTN>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
Background. Advances in genetics may change the practice of medicine in man y ways. Ascertaining practitioners' perceptions about managing the risk of familial breast cancer can give an insight into the current and expected im pact on general practice to inform relevant education. Little is known abou t the practice nurses' (PNs) views of the new genetics in comparison with t hose of the GP. Objectives. Our aim was to describe and compare the views of GPs and PNs on their experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to mana ging familial risk of breast cancer. Method. A questionnaire, assessing views on the current and future impact o f genetic advances in general and on the management of women with a familia l risk of breast cancer, was sent to all GPs and PNs in the 66 practices of the Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority. Results. There was a 69% response rate. The words 'cautious', 'mixed feelin gs', 'hopeful' and 'optimistic' were used most frequently in response to vi ews on genetic advances, but PNs chose more positive words than GPs (P < 0. 001). PNs were also more optimistic than GPs in relation to the future posi tive impact of genetics on practice (P < 0.0001). Sixty-one per cent of GPs and 45% of PNs agreed that genetic advances in relation to breast cancer w ere already affecting their work. A minority of practitioners had attended recent educational events in risk assessment for breast cancer, and only 8% of GPs reported a practice policy on familial breast cancer risk managemen t. Conclusions. GPs and PNs show a cautious optimism in relation to advances i n genetics, with PNs most optimistic. Many perceive that genetic advances i n relation to breast cancer are already affecting their workloads, yet educ ational attendance and practice policies are lacking. Given PN involvement, multi-professional education may be appropriate. Education about risk mana gement, including family history and genetics, might be better integrated i nto more general teaching on the prevention and management of breast cancer , than taught alone.