Is routine amniocentesis for advanced maternal age still indicated?

Citation
M. Dommergues et al., Is routine amniocentesis for advanced maternal age still indicated?, FETAL DIAGN, 16(6), 2001, pp. 372-377
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Reproductive Medicine
Journal title
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY
ISSN journal
10153837 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
6
Year of publication
2001
Pages
372 - 377
Database
ISI
SICI code
1015-3837(200111/12)16:6<372:IRAFAM>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate a policy of selective rather than routine use of amn iocentesis for advanced maternal age. Method: A consecutive series of 359 p regnant women aged 38-47 underwent nuchal translucency measurement (NTM) at 10-14 weeks, maternal serum screening (MSS) by a-fetoprotein (AFP) and hum an chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) at 15-17 weeks, and second trimester ultras ound at 21-23 weeks. Women with NTM <3 mm, MSS-derived risk <1/250, and a n ormal second trimester sonography were considered at low risk and were sugg ested not to have an amniocentesis. Results: Either the NTM or MSS test was positive in 130 women; 105 (81 %) of them elected to have an amniocentesis , versus 122 (53%) of 229 in whom both tests were negative (p < 0.001). Nin eteen (5%) of 359 patients had NTM greater than or equal to3 mm; all 7 case s of Down's syndrome were in this group; 122 (34%) of 359 patients had a MS S-derived risk greater than or equal to1/250; 6 of the 7 cases of Down's sy ndrome were in this group: Ten patients had an abnormal second trimester ul tra- sound, 1 of which had trisomy 18. Of the 219 patients with MSS-derived risk <1/250, a NTM greater than or equal to3 mm, and a normal second trime ster ultrasound, none had a baby with a chromosomal abnormality (95% confid ence interval: 0-1.4%). Conclusion: Amniocentesis may be offered on a selec tive rather than routine basis in women over 38, based upon the results of noninvasive screening tests. Copyright (C) 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel.