Expected net present value (ENPV) is a commonly used criterion in optimal f
orest management; however, this only applies to risk neutrality. If the own
er has other risk preferences, then a utility function should be used. Expe
cted utility is the most common way to handle stochasticity in an atemporal
framework, but is problematic in intertemporal problems. Recursive prefere
nces overcome a variety of the difficulties associated with expected utilit
y in stochastic control problems. Recursive preferences (RP) are applied he
re to forest management. The effects of risk aversion and intertemporal sub
stitution on optimal management are weighed using this framework. Compared
to ENPV, RP with empirically plausible levels of intertemporal substitution
implies substantially increased harvest levels in the early years, which d
rastically reduces the stock growth rate. In contrast, risk aversion has li
ttle or no impact on optimal management except for an infinite elasticity o
f intertemporal substitution. In this instance, increasing risk aversion lo
wers the time to steady-state and the level of steady-state forest stocks.